Okay drop the stupid subject about my stupidity. I was surfing the net when i came across this really dumb "How nerd are you?" test. The questions were a little stupid... They asked if people knew their IP adress, whether they have dead rodents in their rooms and all. I did it honestly and my result was '27' not nerd but not hip too. I was curious to find out how the system worked about 'judging' people. I did the test again, using all the negative answers. Going to bars on fridays, failing tests (4 out of 5).. and so on. My nerd score was '0'. Looking at that result, i realised that come to think of it, its a little stupid. The test understands a person who have no self-respect and discipline as a non-nerd super hip person. That's wrong isn't it. By right, a nerd should be more of a mugger. But the definition of a good or i should say cool person, is to have the directly opposite qualities of what a good person should have. These tests may, in a way, be found confusing by younger and imature children who come across the test in the net. Is it necessarily true that one who does not have self-respect is cool? Or rather a person who is dignified, neat, well-read and sociable a more likable person?
